The European Commission recently announced
that from June 6 to August 6 PV products in China involved in the case of 11.8%
imposed provisional anti-dumping duties. This would not only lead to China's
strong protests in Europe, there are many dissenting voices, which represents
more than 600 PV companies in Europe, "European Union cheap solar"
(AFASE) sound particularly noticeable. In February this year, "Global
Times" reporter in the Alliance 's
news conference, the first time I saw the alliance leader and spokesman Torsten
general Ignatius Shas. His resounding speech, strongly opposed to the European
Union on Chinese PV products taxed words to reporters leaving
"Gladiator" impression.
Not long ago, reporters in Brussels before
the EU headquarters building, and saw members of his organization AFASE
representatives held a "ruined by 200,000 jobs," the march to protest
the European Union on Chinese PV products taxed along the way to attract a lot
of pedestrians stopped asking. At that time, the general Ignatius Shas crutches
stood in the middle of his leg injured in a road accident recently. Injured
continue this "anti-PV taxation," the German "fighter", why
firmly support the Chinese PV companies? Recently, the general Ignatius Shas in
Brussels to
accept the "Global Times" reporter an exclusive interview.
European PV companies will become the
dispute "guilt victim" Global Times: Why the European Commission
insisted on Chinese PV products anti-dumping duties? Within Europe
on the Chinese PV companies taxed, why are there two different voices?
Shas general Ignatius: The European
Commission imposed on China
by 11.8% of the provisional anti-dumping duties, is an extremely short-sighted
diplomacy. EU Trade Commissioner De Gucht that "support for monocrystalline solar cell Union" and "Solar World" organization on behalf of the European
Photovoltaic business interests, he keeps saying that the Chinese PV products
anti-dumping duties, is to give the EU raising the output of photovoltaic
products manufacturer But taxation does not help European companies.
Because European companies can not provide
prices to meet market demand, but also did not meet the European market for the
growing production of photovoltaic products demand. He did so only one result
is that buyers of PV products will flow to other countries. The biggest winner
of this tax is not European manufacturers, but exports to the EU of solarpanels manufacturers in other Asian countries.
Our greatest fear is that the European PV
companies will become the dispute "guilt victim." Two different
voices reflect different interests chase. European solar panel manufacturers
have their interests, which represents more than 600 compared to our European
business interests, it is too light.
没有评论:
发表评论