China is the most important photovoltaic double reverse grounds of objection

U.S. trade with the EU institutions have refused to confirm media reports said two authenticity. Face from the European Union and the United States difficile true news, in addition to the Ministry of Commerce spokesman said, "The case involving an amount of more than 20 billion U.S. dollars, related to the hundreds of thousands of jobs, and resolutely opposed to" outside of China in the attack enterprises do not much effort, they are more to the Southern Weekend reporter that "there is nothing to say."

Throughout the anti-dumping cases, the Chinese side has always stressed once China "double reverse" the damage to the EU more than the Chinese. To this end, China supports solar module power parity Union advisory body commissioned Prognos even made ​​a report pointed out that if the EU imposed a 35% tariff lines will lead to the EU in the first year loss 119,700 jobs, if levied 60 % of the tariff, the EU will lead to loss of 193,700 jobs.

Is this right? China's arguments have been refuted in Europe and America.

On the one hand, this year in March, the European scientific nature of the report questioned, PwC said that the Chinese side that the EU will reduce employment figures, actually more than the German official statistics the total number of jobs in the industry, so the research is not available letter. On the other hand, data from the United States also make the Chinese feel embarrassed. Prior to China's most important grounds of objection, that said anti-dumping will seriously damage the U.S. solar industry, leading the U.S. photovoltaic products supply drops, prices rise.

However, the U.S. anti-dumping duties on China after a year, the dramatic situation happened: U.S. local solar panel price prices falling instead of rising, and in 2012 a record U.S. solar capacity to reach 3.31GW, an increase of 76%. These data are propagated by the Chinese anti-dumping will result in adverse consequences credibility greatly reduced.

Now look, the Chinese war of the early and high-level lobbying, although the combination of domestic forces, but did not have a material impact on the EU - the EU ProSun to the Southern Weekend reporter's e-mail reply, the other side has repeatedly stressed that the Chinese enterprises have at their disposal sufficient evidence of dumping practices. Although these "evidence" has never been published before.