Production and marketing of photovoltaic double reverse to avoid the risk diversification

Than expected as early as two days the deadline, the European Commission announced the evening Beijing time, the European Union since June 6 onwards on the production of solar panels from China and key components of 11.8% imposed provisional anti-dumping duties. If the two sides failed to reach a solution within two months, then the tax rate will rise to 47.6%.

Deepest feelings, is living in one of the PV in the enterprise. Recently, China's first landing NASDAQ sunlight photovoltaic mppt solar charge controller power integrated enterprise Artes CEO Qu Xiaohua told reporters, about the Chinese PV companies face the growing tension in the external environment, indomitable Industrial bigger and stronger heart. 

Final: or transit

Reporter: EU levy punitive tariffs, will be on as the representative of China in Artes enterprises how it hurts? Qu Xiaohua: U.S. "double reverse" only for the battery, but the EU's "double reverse" survey include the source of the polysilicon , until the final silicon PV modules, therefore, the EU Chinese PV products, "dual", not only for China, the global PV monocrystalline solar panel industry will give a devastating impact. China PV industry directly employed population over 50 million, driven indirectly employed population over 100 million people. Anticipated large PV companies will be in trouble. 

However, the first two months of anti-dumping duties imposed lower for Chinese enterprises and China and the EU to provide a buffer period of consultation, but also for future negotiations to open two sides of the window. Is worth noting that the preliminary ruling procedure and the different aspects of the final ruling is of decisive significance of the voting members, so the next two to six months, is still two sides to negotiate the critical period.

Reporter: For a country's "dual" will almost certainly cause the other side of the trade counter, causing a trade war. In most member states are opposed to the case, the European Commission why do they still insist? Qu Xiaohua: Chinese PV starting from a blank, decade, more than 60% of the global market. This achievement is the Chinese enterprises in the market of others, in accordance with the standards of others to enjoy subsidies others developed step by step, and also to create a highly competitive international PV enterprise group.

Industry in China, able to score much more than this. Great achievements have envied, had adopted a "dual" approach to stop it. U.S. and European pressure on the Chinese PV industry is to limit its development, the desire to surpass China in the emerging field of energy has achieved a leading position. EU thinks through the "dual" can beat Chinese rivals, but only shooting itself in the foot, dog in the manger.